Web standards promised that we could develop once, deploy everywhere. I can’t help but wonder about that premise after reading @bradfrost’s post, Device Fatigue.
I believe in web standards. I have spent a good part of my last decade working to write standards-based code that validates.
But if we have to test sites on hundreds of devices, it’s hard to argue that web apps are better than native apps because they just need to be developed once to be available everywhere.
First of all, huge congratulations to Mat Marquis, Jason Grigsby, Scott Jehl, Ethan Marcotte, Florian Rioval and all the other web geniuses who are working to make responsive images much, much easier for those working with responsive web design.
Today is a milestone. The Responsive Images Community Group of the W3C has now published their proposal for responsive images, the picture element, as a W3C draft. Make sure to read the draft of the picture element. It’s a great step towards a better web.
Lately, I have been thinking a lot about responsive web design, mobile design in general and the argument over web applications vs native apps. Here’s my take.
A Chasing After Wind is not just a short story collection; another story surrounds the telling of these stories. These contemporary stories walk the border between science fiction and fantasy, where moments of humor emerge from tragedies. Is this struggle in vain, a chasing after wind? Or does everyone deserve a second chance?
I am a web designer and developer with a passion for web standards, accessibility, usability, and information architecture. My toolbox includes hand-coding XHTML and CSS, Drupal, ColdFusion, and all things Adobe.
When my head is not in the web, I enjoy walks with my wife and dog through our lovely neighborhood (walks with our cat proved counterproductive), time with friends, traveling, reading, movies, fantasy and science fiction, Blu-Ray, a nice meal now and then, and all things iPhone.
If I were a flavor of ice cream, trust me, it would not be IE6.